old toby
07-23-2007, 11:37 AM
For the past few years, our Pack has had a budget/fundraising plan like this:
1. Sell as much popcorn as you can (no actual goals, no planned budget to set a target).
2. Divide the profit this way: of the 33% that the Pack gets, 2/3 goes to the pack, 1/3 goes to the scout's den.
3. After the Pack recieves it's total (minus the den profits), figure out how to spend it.
We have had really successful popcorn sales this way, but from my perspective it's not a good way to plan. 50% of our sales comes from 2 dens who really go crazy on the sales, and there are about 10% of the scouts who sell nothing. But we all share in the outcome of the fundraising, i.e. lots of great events. The problem is that we 'wing' the budget each year, never knowing how much we'll have to spend. Which leads to much debate over allocating funds.
This year I'm trying to convince my Pack leadership to adopt the "Ideal Year of Scouting" budget/fundraising plan (as found on http://www.scouting.org/cubscouts/resources/packbudget/index.html).
Meaning, we set an annual budget, divide it by the number of scouts, and establish a 'per scout' budget goal ($120 right now, which doesn't include the $40 recharter fee). Our popcorn sale will give each scout the opportunity to fundraise his goal, and any scout's fundraising in excess of his goal can be put towards his Residence Camp, uniform, scout supplies, den dues, etc.
So the concept is that each scout will sell his Pack goal, and then we'll get 100% of our budget covered. With a planned budget, there should be no need for debate on how to spend the money. One side benefit is that making the budget means we won't have to charge a 'per-event' fee, since everything's covered in the budget. Another benefit is that annually, new leadership just needs to take up the annual budget process and continue it, year to year. Not redesign the wheel each year.
My question is: what to do if not all scouts pay in to their share of the goal? Let's say 80% of the scouts sell their goal. And the remaining 20% don't make their goal (either by choice or just poor luck in selling).
Since this means we won't make our budget, how do we handle this? This is where our Committee is at odds. Here are the options I'd like your opinion on:
A. Accept direct payments from parents to make up the difference between their sales and their goal; this way we meet out budget, but then have to worry about collecting from delinquent parents. Some leaders object to forcing parents to pay out of pocket, and that no one should be forced to pay anything for scouting, more than their $40 recharter fee.
B. Don't accept payments from parents. If we don't meet our budget, then we decide what to cut from our plan. Some leaders object to this, as we'll have events that are of 'less quality' than what we've planned. And we're again into the debate about what to keep and what to cut.
C. Don't accept payments from parents. If we don't meet our budget, we decide which events will be under-funded, and charge a small fee for those events, to make up the missing budget. The debate between the leaders here is, do we charge the fee across the board to everyone, including those who already paid their fair share? Or just to those who didn't meet their commitment?
In summary, my goal of adopting the "Official Cub Scout Budget Planning" process (Ideal Year of Scouting) helps the Pack in making the budget process consistent, year-to-year, and helps the scouts by giving them the ability to fundraise for more than just the pack budget. But the leaders can't agree on what to do if we don't make the goal.
I appreciate any and all comments and opinions on this subject -
1. Sell as much popcorn as you can (no actual goals, no planned budget to set a target).
2. Divide the profit this way: of the 33% that the Pack gets, 2/3 goes to the pack, 1/3 goes to the scout's den.
3. After the Pack recieves it's total (minus the den profits), figure out how to spend it.
We have had really successful popcorn sales this way, but from my perspective it's not a good way to plan. 50% of our sales comes from 2 dens who really go crazy on the sales, and there are about 10% of the scouts who sell nothing. But we all share in the outcome of the fundraising, i.e. lots of great events. The problem is that we 'wing' the budget each year, never knowing how much we'll have to spend. Which leads to much debate over allocating funds.
This year I'm trying to convince my Pack leadership to adopt the "Ideal Year of Scouting" budget/fundraising plan (as found on http://www.scouting.org/cubscouts/resources/packbudget/index.html).
Meaning, we set an annual budget, divide it by the number of scouts, and establish a 'per scout' budget goal ($120 right now, which doesn't include the $40 recharter fee). Our popcorn sale will give each scout the opportunity to fundraise his goal, and any scout's fundraising in excess of his goal can be put towards his Residence Camp, uniform, scout supplies, den dues, etc.
So the concept is that each scout will sell his Pack goal, and then we'll get 100% of our budget covered. With a planned budget, there should be no need for debate on how to spend the money. One side benefit is that making the budget means we won't have to charge a 'per-event' fee, since everything's covered in the budget. Another benefit is that annually, new leadership just needs to take up the annual budget process and continue it, year to year. Not redesign the wheel each year.
My question is: what to do if not all scouts pay in to their share of the goal? Let's say 80% of the scouts sell their goal. And the remaining 20% don't make their goal (either by choice or just poor luck in selling).
Since this means we won't make our budget, how do we handle this? This is where our Committee is at odds. Here are the options I'd like your opinion on:
A. Accept direct payments from parents to make up the difference between their sales and their goal; this way we meet out budget, but then have to worry about collecting from delinquent parents. Some leaders object to forcing parents to pay out of pocket, and that no one should be forced to pay anything for scouting, more than their $40 recharter fee.
B. Don't accept payments from parents. If we don't meet our budget, then we decide what to cut from our plan. Some leaders object to this, as we'll have events that are of 'less quality' than what we've planned. And we're again into the debate about what to keep and what to cut.
C. Don't accept payments from parents. If we don't meet our budget, we decide which events will be under-funded, and charge a small fee for those events, to make up the missing budget. The debate between the leaders here is, do we charge the fee across the board to everyone, including those who already paid their fair share? Or just to those who didn't meet their commitment?
In summary, my goal of adopting the "Official Cub Scout Budget Planning" process (Ideal Year of Scouting) helps the Pack in making the budget process consistent, year-to-year, and helps the scouts by giving them the ability to fundraise for more than just the pack budget. But the leaders can't agree on what to do if we don't make the goal.
I appreciate any and all comments and opinions on this subject -