verebm
08-13-2007, 04:14 PM
I'm looking for some help from the collective wisdom gathered here. I have just taken over as the new SM and have recently returned from a week of summer camp. Since then I have been approached by a number of parents of younger scouts who have told me their sons relayed incidents of bad language from the older scouts. The language seems to have run the gamut from cussing (including the "f-word") to a wide range of sexual innuendo. I know who the offenders are and in a sense I am not surprised that their names were the ones to be mentioned.
Of the three mentioned, one is an Eagle Scout, one is either Star or Life and the other one is a Tenderfoot or 2nd Class who's been in the troop for 4 years (he has a number of other issues that I need to address but I won't go into them here). Let's call them Andy, Billy and Charlie, respectively. In the short time since I've taken over (only a month or so), I have spoken to each of them (including at summer camp) about their language, their attitude and/or their actions but obviously simply talking to them doesn't seem to be effective.
Billy seems to be the only one that can really be motivated by my withholding signature on scout spirit. Andy already has Eagle (I suppose he could approach completion of Palms but I'm not sure if he will before he "ages" out in the next 4 to 6 months) and Charlie isn't really into rank advancement so denying rank advancement for either one of them by withholding my signature doesn't seem likely or sufficiently grave to warrant a behavior adjustment. And even as far as Billy is concerned, while I've mentioned to him that his actions do not display scout spirit, I don't know how long it would take for him to complete all the requirements for his next rank and I don't want to wait until his next Scoutmaster conference to address this current situation.
What I'd like to know is how some of you have handled situations like this. I've considered telling them they're not welcome to any more campouts until they apologize for their behavior. If I do that, however, I would feel compelled to require that it be a public apology during one of the troop meetings since I don't want either of the offenders to know who told on them. Is this a legitimate way of dealing with it? Are there better ways of handling this issue? What has worked for you?
Thanks in advance for all your suggestions...
Mark
Of the three mentioned, one is an Eagle Scout, one is either Star or Life and the other one is a Tenderfoot or 2nd Class who's been in the troop for 4 years (he has a number of other issues that I need to address but I won't go into them here). Let's call them Andy, Billy and Charlie, respectively. In the short time since I've taken over (only a month or so), I have spoken to each of them (including at summer camp) about their language, their attitude and/or their actions but obviously simply talking to them doesn't seem to be effective.
Billy seems to be the only one that can really be motivated by my withholding signature on scout spirit. Andy already has Eagle (I suppose he could approach completion of Palms but I'm not sure if he will before he "ages" out in the next 4 to 6 months) and Charlie isn't really into rank advancement so denying rank advancement for either one of them by withholding my signature doesn't seem likely or sufficiently grave to warrant a behavior adjustment. And even as far as Billy is concerned, while I've mentioned to him that his actions do not display scout spirit, I don't know how long it would take for him to complete all the requirements for his next rank and I don't want to wait until his next Scoutmaster conference to address this current situation.
What I'd like to know is how some of you have handled situations like this. I've considered telling them they're not welcome to any more campouts until they apologize for their behavior. If I do that, however, I would feel compelled to require that it be a public apology during one of the troop meetings since I don't want either of the offenders to know who told on them. Is this a legitimate way of dealing with it? Are there better ways of handling this issue? What has worked for you?
Thanks in advance for all your suggestions...
Mark